?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Catharisis NOW [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Daniel

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

(no subject) [Oct. 6th, 2005|12:28 am]
Daniel
i'm empty, like a cup of coffee.
linkpost comment

Appending --- --- [Oct. 30th, 2004|03:53 pm]
Daniel
[mood |scaredscared]
[music |There's only Alice . . .]

and happy halloween =)
linkpost comment

Welcoming myself back [Oct. 30th, 2004|03:47 pm]
Daniel
[mood |mellowmellow]
[music |Tom Waits - Alice]

Since I have no other route to release my catharsis, I am resorting to a journal again. I would write more but my coffee just finished and I have research to do.
linkpost comment

(no subject) [Mar. 10th, 2004|05:16 pm]
Daniel

link1 comment|post comment

(no subject) [Mar. 10th, 2004|05:13 pm]
Daniel
linkpost comment

Studying at HSSE [Mar. 8th, 2004|11:01 pm]
Daniel
Derrida.
Performative speech is not accounted for in Austin's classical structures for language. (it's referred to as an exception.) All elements of language and experience are really graphemes without any force. Anything said/written can be misconstrued into something else. There are large gaps. The writing exists without the presence of the author through iterability -through readability. The writing exists without the reader. The writing exists without the context.

Why Deconstruction is inherently nothing at all.
Deconstruction is an ex-appropriation- it is always something else, so it never is. Derrida means "nothing at all" as in something that can be determined by rules or logic. What it could be defined as (rules, codes, etc.), is what it calls into question.

Searle.
The gap between text and origin is different from the way in which any expression can be severed from its meaning through iterability.
The gap between text and origin is caused by permanence of text which survives the death of the author/context/reader. (it is genuinely "graphematic.")
The gap between expression and meaning through citationality is since any system of representation must have some representing devices, it is always possible to consider those devices separately from their roles. (nothing "graphematic.")

dictionary words.
putative - the supposed.
perspicacious - clear-sighted.
dissemination - to scatter wildly.
semantic - of meaning in language.
a fortiori - for a still stronger reason.
linkpost comment

back at school [Aug. 25th, 2003|12:25 pm]
Daniel
[mood |goodgood]
[music |Circle Takes the Square - Kill the Switch]

so im back at school once again. my senior year.. which kinda creeps me out. i know amir just went through this, but its really frightening to be here and to think, a year from now this whole experience will be over, or at least significatly changed. i won't feel part of the community here - as if i ever did - but i won't feel like a stupid undergrad that can act like a fool and still call himself a child .. ill be forced to act older! i don't know, maybe not. even if i have to go to grad school here, things will be different. everythings so overwelming right now. i have so much work to do and so little time to do it.. applications coming up .. essays .. explainations .. decisions .. coursework .. =\
on a brighter note i saw my friend phil today on campus .. we talked for a little bit about summer and classes etc .. he said there was this really rad class i should take as an elective where you get your own tablet pc and write an application for it.. i would be so down for that .. the only catch is that you have to have an A in operating systems.. so im going to have to work my ass of this semester =( .. but its definitely a possibility.
todays been going really slow thanks to my time change of 1 hour less .. i feel like ive done a whole lot, and its still 12:30.. which i dig, but of course that feeling will disappear im sure in a couple days.. oh well. im probably going to go study in vienna today for lsats and drink some coffee. afterwards, ill probably hit up tommys and chill over there for a while =)
la di da
link3 comments|post comment

Bad marx paper i wrote in prague [Aug. 18th, 2003|09:30 am]
Daniel
[mood |like a dumbass]

So there was a specter haunting eastern Europe, the specter of communism – says Marx at the beginning of the Communist Manifesto. And so in the 1930s with the Bolshevic Revolution Europe became frightened – so did the United States. Capitalism was at stake to be replaced by something grand or transcendent. Well, so they wished. Stalinism erupted and created a big scare everywhere – in the United States persecuting all governmental communist sympathizers and in Europe by getting rid of all the progressive intellectuals – communists and non-communists alike. At this point communism became a totalitarian system. It stopped being for the people and started being for whatever the government wanted. It became a paradox and crossed that border into the laughable – or crossed into a horrifying experience if you were there. So it grew worse and worse with the line tapping, photo snapping, and political silence. Refugee camps came in. Everyone was afraid. The United States grew weary also. Photo snapping and line tapping the same as the Soviets – looking for spies. Cold war – fear spread like a disease everywhere. Its funny how the American politicians were able to pair up the communist ideology with the evils that the Soviets were committing. The two were unrelated but it played an important role. A dualism: keep capitalism safe – keep our political pocketbooks full – and keep us out of Soviet paranoia and harm. Anyways, so eventually the Soviets fell. The Americans and Europeans cheered. Then the Americans moved in for a takeover. So what can be learned from this experience? Did the United States really absorb any of it? What lessons should Americans take from the historical experience of communism? Should any of the communist doctrine be adopted into United States political agendas?
First before being able to answer any of these questions, we must see where the Soviets went wrong. To do I must outline Marx's main theories. I promise to be as brief as possible. To begin Marx analyzes the production of commodities. He looks at how commodities are produced on a small scale where singular workers create and distribute their own goods. He then looks at how capitalism works. He looks at how classes arise. How the worker really because a commodity. How the workers are exploited by their employers. How the worker is alienated from the goods he produces. I will not go into any detail because it is not really needed for my purpose.
The general purpose is to see that Soviet communism did not fix any of these problems. If anything it amplified them. Instead of the means of production being placed in the hands of the proletariat, it was placed in the hands of the political elite. The money was kept there and fed to the workers – much like a corporation in capitalism. The whole society was one big corporation that handled all the production. So there was no chance to remove the alienation of the worker. They couldn't find any meaning in making the goods because they were still being treated as a commodity themselves. It did not get rid of classes in society. It merely separated them further. The labor force and the political bourgeois. Their methods to establish the proletariat as the powerful were all wrong and destroyed the efficiency of the workforce. This is because the intellectuals and the progressives were all forced to do manual labor. The people that new how to manage and were meant for their jobs were not allowed to participate. Things were just done blatantly wrong. Quality decreased.
Not only was it unsuccessful in producing the results that it strove for, it became a totalitarian system. With the means of production in the hands of the political elite, it was no wonder they took complete control over the country. Any dissidence was crushed. Political opponents were tracked, interrogated, jailed, exported, militarized, or killed. Everyone was afraid. They could not display anything opposing the government and this led to them to have to be nationalistic. If you joined the party you got immense benefit. You received schooling, better jobs, and security.
So the social reality of the communist era was very different than what was the original intent of the dreamers. The dreamers were all kicked out anyways. They wanted to critique the system and help the people. The government only wanted to conserve it and keep it the way it was. There was no chance for a liberal working society or socialism or a democracy. It was a totalitarian state where everyone was controlled.
So what lessons should the people in the United States be taught from the historical experience of communism? There are a few. One, that youth movements work. They can create change. The people do have power and influence on the system. I think we have learned this from revolutions and dissidence and it was displayed in our dissidence against the government in the '60s with the Vietnam war as well as today in our dissidence against the WTO, IMF, and World Bank. It was displayed this year with our dissidence against the war in Iraq.
We've learned to see how bad something good can go. No matter how great the intentions, if power is left in the wrong hands it can lead to tyranny. We recognize when a president is abusing his power. Passing acts that violate our rights for general causes that will never end. We've learned to stand up for what we believe in. We've learned the power of cooperatives. That the power of people working together is immense. We've learned that capitalism isn't the end, that it still can have a successor. That we don't have to support something that is a breeding ground of hate, racism, sexism, homophobia, and classism. That we don't have to let our government destroy the environment.
I think the United States in general has learned from the mistakes of communism but it is still blinded. We don't recognize the corporate media as being so controlling over our lives. We don't recognize the ties between corporations and our government. Who got all the oil wells in Iraq? Oh, Dick Cheney's old company. Where are the weapons of mass destruction again? We don't pick up on why we have such horrific murder rates and why we have guns in our schools. We think its human nature. The consciousness of the people has awoken and its just a matter of spreading the word.
So do i think that some of the objectives of the communist doctrine should be reconsidered and placed on the agenda of the political parties in the United States? Yes. I voted for Nader. I support the environment. I support labor unions. I think that it should be added in so we have a balance of political ideas. Not just republicans and neo-liberals. I think with a greater balance of ideas the more fair the system works out. The less one sided it becomes. For we do condemn nations thats hold one party elections. So why not condemn ourselves for not letting more independents have a chance. Why let money control the political arena? I think that left wing input would level things out. It would help spread awareness throughout the country that one way isn't the only way of doing things.
linkpost comment

Paper i wrote in prague [Aug. 18th, 2003|09:27 am]
Daniel
[mood |contemplativecontemplative]
[music |Jr. Ewing - Repitition is Failure]

How can one possibly deal with the past? It is always there haunting many of us. Not only do our past actions get in the way of our current actions, but they shape who we are. Memories are a journal of our lives. Often, these memories are so profound that we often wish for a repetition of them. We feel nostalgia for the past. We learn to ask ourselves, how can this present possibly live up to what I’ve already experienced in the past? As Kundera points out at the very beginning of Ignorance, nostalgia comes from the two Greek words: nostos (return) and algos (suffering). Nostalgia is the act of suffering under a yearning to return. As most will discover, nostalgia is unappeasable. The past can never be repeated exactly. Events in time are singular. If there is a forcing of the present to be the past it only becomes a disappointment and a blunder. For the feelings of the past will at best be reproduced and with repetition comes boredom. I say at best here because this is the original goal of nostalgic recovery. This nostalgic forcing only causes the present to be a failure. In essence, the present will never become a memory you will be nostalgic for because it will be only remembered as a repetition.
Not only do memories cause suffering through nostalgia; there is also the opposite feeling of distaste for the past caused by unpleasant memories. These memories cause us to want to forget. What is the best way to deal with this? How can one face living through the Holocaust? How can one face an affair? An abusive childhood? These are the problems heard every day throughout the world. How to deal with a past of suffering is a question that spans time. Tolstoy asked it in Anna Karenina. Hardy asked it in Tess of the D’Urbervilles. Hugo asked it in Les Miserables. Every relationship or life that has been or will be will run into this problem. But there must be an answer to this time old question for we manage to live our lives through the Holocaust, through Stalin, through every atrocity and it does not always end up destroying us. I think there is an existential answer to this question. How can one possibly deal with the past and form constructive relationships with it (no matter how great or horrific it is)?
In Ignorance, Kundera explains that we really only retain a tiny scrap of memory when compared with all the time in our lives. So the life we live is not actually our life in reality, but the reality we make up for ourselves to take the place of memories lost. It’s the combination of past truths and our illusions. If we could remember everything, our lives would be completely different. The nostalgia felt refers to these illusions. That in fact is why nostalgia is such a common feeling. The memories we add into the mix mostly provide a better sense of how the past happened so it becomes more desirable.
That’s why in The Book of Laughter and Forgetting, Mama had imagined that she had recited a patriotic poem celebrating the end of the Austrian Empire. It gave her dignity, at least more than the reality of reciting a Christmas poem. Even upon remembering that it indeed was not a patriotic event, she still decided to leave herself with the new imaginary reality because it made her look less ignorant in front of her son.
So, when asking ourselves the question, how can this present possibly live up to what I’ve already experienced in the past, we automatically trap ourselves. Our past is so unattainable because of our added imagination that our present can never possibly live up to it unless the question is never asked in the first place. If nostalgia is ignored, then the present can proceed into an unbounded infinity of possibilities where anything can happen and there is a chance for a happieness greater than that which you have felt in the past.
This infinity is expressed in The Book of Laughter and Forgetting. Kundera explains two types of time. The first is linear time. It is the type of time that we generally think associates with the term, time as a passing moment, something quantitative and mathematical. In it to progress is to regress because the longer we wait the less time we have. The less time we have before a paper is due, before we grow old, and before we die. This time is terrifying and leaves us with the reality of being alone. In this time nostalgia exists. We look upon a line of time or a sequence of events always dreading the end and therefore always seeking to return to the beginning. Being nostalgic gives us a false sense of being young again, escape from death, and escape from loneliness.
This is the time Bara is stuck in throughout the majority of Klima’s The Ultimate Intimacy. She is unable to deal with the impermanence of the world and unable to handle the fact that death is inevitable and unpredictable. No one can stop her death. She is totally out of control. No one can love her forever. She knows the truths of reality and is in despair over it. Daniel feels similar. He says he finds being close to death oppressive. He however shields himself in his religion –‘He has freed us from the very arms of death and will free us...’ But this is false to him, for he has no faith and arrives at, “And yet I still feel anxious. More so than most other people perhaps.” (Klima 8)
The other type of time is an infinite time, a circle. It is the realization that there is infinity in the now. By that I mean that in every split second there are limitless possibilities for action and unbounding possibilities for intensification. It is an intensification of the self. It is being able to look inward and to find meaning in everything you do. This type of time, Kundera explains, is made through variations. A variation is a point at which, “concentration is brought to a maximum.” It allows us to “go straight to the core of the matter.” Instead of seeing life as repetitious, you turn to see it as a set of these variations. One event is never played over; each similar event is connected to another to form its own section of the circle. Each variation has its own theme. Life becomes a clump of these variations which are neverending. There are connections everywhere between everything and there is meaning lying in each. Life ceases to be a beginning and an end but a collection of pieces which form a puzzle.
This is exemplified in Ignorance. Milada (if not her, some other random girl) in her younger years is fascinated by the repetition of events that play out between her current boyfriend and her ex. She notices that they try to kiss her at the same spot in teh forest, that they both look good in a blue jacket, that they both use the same words to woo her. She notices these “furtive contacts between present and past; she seeks out these echoes.” She feels that these connections reduce the gap in the temporal dimension between past and present and it gives her a sense of growth. They give her meaning, “The intrusion of the previous boyfriend into the story she is currently living is to her mind not some secret infidelity; it adds further to her fondness for the man walking beside her now.” Growing older, she sees these repetitions as a lack of individuality in individuals, as a mere fact. She loses that sense of meaning in coincidence. (Kundera 79-80) She stops living in a meaningful time and moves on to a time where she must end and she is alone. She even probably feels nostalgic about her childhood naivete in finding meaning in such petty things. With the infinite time you learn to expand the great pleasures in life and learn from them. It is the most intimate connection that one can have with the moments he is experiencing.
The case for memory intensification is quite a bit easier than the case for dealing with memories that one looks back upon with scorn. If never overcome, memories from the past will haunt us forever, distort our lives, or drive us into despair. If there is an intent to overcome these memores, one must look deep down in his heart to find the answers to his secluded inner questions. Let me follow with:
Dealing with the fact that a lover has cheated on you and betrayed all promises is a difficult one. The memory will never leave and always haunt you. How can one deal with this properly? Should we forgive the lover for her sins? Laugh at oneself? Or decide that through everything I am still going to love this person? Immediately after the fact there are certainly two main obvious routes: one, this person has wronged me, disrespected me, and I refuse to continue with this relationship. Two, just yesterday this person loved me and said she cared for me, so this betrayal isn’t derived from lack of love, but from some other problem that has yet to be figured out. We love still so we will work through this. Even if the latter is correct, out of all rashness the former is chosen. You move on. There must be love elsewhere with someone who won’t hurt me. So you move on, but the memory remains. I still love her. This isn’t what I need. She is what I need. Any new relationship will cary the burdens of the previous one. Not only that, love without hurt is an illusion. But being back in the previous relationship doesn’t solve the problem either. It magnifies it. You are scared and deathly jealous. But even through the jealously you manage to pinpoin the original sin and correct it as best as possible. Now at this point, there is either the option to forgive or forget.
You could forget and fill in the missing pieces with false memories. The end result of such an action would be the same as otherwise –You could both still be together and be relatively happy in your falsehoods. There is no sense of meaning in this path, though. Both lovers lose their connection to each other because when you interject new memories they are yours alone and your lover will inevitably remember something different. A part of intimacy will be lost and it will slowly tear holes in the relationship.
The other options is to forgive the lover completely. This requires some great strength and faith inyourself as well as the lover. There must be strength in yourself to overcome your own self-doubts and to feel worthy of love. You must have faith in your lover that she has been completely honest with you and will continue to do so in the future. There must be a complete understand between the lovers as to what has happened and the relationship must be strong enough to bare that weight.
On the other hand, this is not easy on the betraying lover either. The lover must bare an even greater weight. She must face guilt in the face and learn how to cope with you taking her back. By giving her your faith you put immense pressure on her. She must also put faith in you that you will not only not regress to your previous faults, which led to the affair, but also not seek retribution against her.
So when looked upon merely at the surface we can catch a glimpse of an answer on how to deal with such difficult circumstances. Somehow it involves faith, love, and forgiveness. When something horrific like this happens the belief system you had that kept the relationship together collapses, the trust is completely broken. The person that was is non-existent. After the belief system crashes down there are three options. One, there is a new belief system formulated around something or someone else. This in a sense is really not moving on at all because you haven’t grown or learned anything from the experience. It would be similar to giving up the cheating lover, forgetting all about the affair, and finding someone else. If there is not another fall into a belief system, then there must be a death of the old self who believed in the lover.
This is similar to Kafka’s Metamorphosis, but on a smaller scale. Gregor severed all ties with humanity and felt utterly alone. He needed to learn how to do everything over again. His self image had to die and the image of others to him died also. The same must happen when we die in our lover example. After the death there must be a rebirth. It is the stage in which you must learn to do everything over again. It starts with the alone time after the breakup, relearning yourself, regaining a self image, reestablishing that you are worthy of another human being. It continues on to seeking a new mate and travels so far as realizing that your previous lover is the one you belong with. Then starts a new stage. It is a stage where our lovers try to learn about themselves all over again. To learn why the hurt started in the first place and how to prevent it from happening again.
This rebirth can move in one of two directions both of which give you the realization that there is a nothingness surrounding you. There is a constant aloneness no matter what you do or what you believe. It can result in a nihilistic nature where nothing matters. For example, if he decided to take retribution against the lover to hurt her and to somehow make up for that fact that she has hurt him. It is to move the relationship into a state of destruction where both partners are in a constant state of pain and suffering. The other possibility is to rise to faith. You realize that all your life was a gift. That all there is to offer is a body and a soul. Both lovers are naked before God. Love exists between the two lovers not for any reason at all. It just is. They lose all sense of why and fall into infinity.
So to be more general, to break free of a horibble past requires a death of the self and rebirth. The most progressive form of this rebirth is the reach for faith and the discovery of the infinite, which is very similar to the sense of infinite time. By realizing you are alone before God, one learns to deal with aloneness in a more constructive way than feeling lonely. All despair can be thrown away and there is room to appreciate the past and find meaning in even the most dreadful things.
linkpost comment

Something i wrote back in HS [Aug. 18th, 2003|09:24 am]
Daniel
[mood |artisticartistic]
[music |Boards of Canada - In a Beautiful Place Out in the Country]

Relaxing. A final word, a final thought. This is what I realize as I began my journey. My relaxation is my one comfort. Days can never be a waste. A day of relaxment is a day I choose to think. These thoughts occur to me sitting at my chair, my place. The delightful horns in the background, the one I love across my drink. I sip. The warm fluid caresses my mouth sullenly. There is no time to talk. All I need is thoughts. Wandering through her eyes I can see where I am present and in the future. After this thought I sigh. Sigh. I hear the horns again in a different tone. I open my eyes and stare at the spinning light. What a fabulous marvel. It spins round and round like the sun changing indefinatly. Definate. What is definate? My status? My friends? My future? I know one thing. I am definate. I smile. Turning around I glance out of the glass that separates me from this beautiful world. The moon is here. With it, it carries its clouds; bright and everflowing with hazyness. My moon is not full. It was, however, a few days ago. Look up. My roof was open. The moon, bright, full, wonderful. Clouds surroudning it so. With delightful separations. The grey and black colors became more than just shades. What's a generation without a reason to believe. My voice aches. I glance over and ask how she feels. I ask this not expecting a good response. I want a true response. I want to know your mental condition, everything. I do this however not for your benefit I do this because I love you. It helps me know you. I take the last sip. My salad is finished. I sit back and smile. Smile! What a wonderful thought. What a wonderful taste! I stare across the table. This woman I do not know, but who I have been talking to for the past two hours smiles at me. I use the term woman to because to not because she is old. IN FACT! She is close to my age. But I use this because she is fantastically mature. I shake my bottle. Waves of bubbles erupt. I am pleased. So I do repeat the action, holding the bottle to my eyes I almost cry at the sight of such beauty. I open. I smell. Albsolutely perfect! I close the bottle and return it. I shall wait. The sights the smells I have experienced are ones I have lived many times. But not from this drink. From my world! From the smooth and gay rain! From the tantalising smell of ozone. I grasp the bottle. Its shape is like none other I grin, Laugh even! -Walking through the grass, another blade next to you-you await. I await. For the day when I can talk free. Free of conformity, free of you, free of eachother. I don't believe you know why I smile when I'm with you. I am content. Grin. Happy. I smile because I am everything you are not. And you are everything I lack. I smile because I know what you are thinking. I smile because I could not be anywhere else. I smile because you are content; finally. With who you are. Who you want to be. You will understand, someday as we are next to forever live together. So I smile. I STAND. I ask a stranger a question I have not asked before. The answer is pleasing. Enjoyment for my next weekend. My empty glass sits next to me. I stare at it. Studying the many inconsistancies. I stop. I grin. I lay down and look back into the glass. My moon is gone. Streaks of beautiful light exsist however. The clouds around are illuminated for unknown causes. I laugh. When shall I ever see a night like this again? Tomarrow? Never? Yesterday. So I roll over, think of your face, and fall asleep.
linkpost comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]